<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Iterative Business Development</title>
	<link>http://www.thisthatandthecode.com/2008/03/24/iterative-business-development/</link>
	<description>A Techie Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 18:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt Ambrose</title>
		<link>http://www.thisthatandthecode.com/2008/03/24/iterative-business-development/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Ambrose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 01:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thisthatandthecode.com/2008/03/24/iterative-business-development/#comment-40</guid>
		<description>I agree, very interesting idea applying XP precepts to the world of business development. The one question that you do not (yet) address is what kinds of businesses would this be suitable (or unsuitable) for considering the problem you noted with Continuous Integration. Surely this approach would be best suited to low-regulated service industry businesses and "one-off" product lines. For example a wedding planner or a deserts bakery might be able to use this model, but an accounting firm could not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, very interesting idea applying XP precepts to the world of business development. The one question that you do not (yet) address is what kinds of businesses would this be suitable (or unsuitable) for considering the problem you noted with Continuous Integration. Surely this approach would be best suited to low-regulated service industry businesses and &#8220;one-off&#8221; product lines. For example a wedding planner or a deserts bakery might be able to use this model, but an accounting firm could not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
